On March 13, 2025, a significant protest unfolded at Trump Tower in New York City, resulting in the arrest of nearly 100 individuals. Organized by Jewish Voice for Peace, the demonstration aimed to advocate for the release of Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist and Columbia University graduate student detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Background on Mahmoud Khalil
Mahmoud Khalil, a legal permanent U.S. resident married to an American citizen, has been an active participant in pro-Palestinian demonstrations at Columbia University. Born in Syria to Palestinian grandparents, Khalil completed his master’s degree requirements in December 2024. On March 8, 2025, he was arrested outside his New York City apartment by ICE agents and subsequently transferred to an immigration detention center in Louisiana. The Trump administration is seeking his deportation under a seldom-invoked provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act, citing foreign policy concerns.
The Protest at Trump Tower
The protest commenced around noon, with demonstrators donning red shirts emblazoned with slogans such as “Not in Our Name” and “Jews Say Stop Arming Israel.” They filled the lobby of Trump Tower, chanting “Free Mahmoud Khalil” and displaying banners that read “Never Again for Anyone” and “Jews Say Do Not Comply.”
Despite multiple warnings from the New York Police Department (NYPD) to vacate the premises, the protesters remained steadfast. Approximately an hour into the demonstration, officers began making arrests, detaining at least 98 individuals on charges of trespassing and resisting arrest. The detainees were escorted out of the building in zip ties and transported via police vehicles.
Statements from Organizers and Participants
Sonya Meyerson-Knox, communications director for Jewish Voice for Peace, emphasized the group’s commitment to opposing what they perceive as authoritarian measures by the Trump administration. She stated, “We know our history and we are here to say ‘never again.'” Meyerson-Knox highlighted the importance of speaking out against actions that target individuals based on their political activism.
Among the protesters was actress Debra Winger, who criticized the administration’s actions, asserting that they have “no interest in Jewish safety” and are “co-opting antisemitism.” She expressed her support for Khalil, stating, “I’m just standing up for my rights, and I’m standing up for Mahmoud Khalil, who has been abducted illegally.”
Legal and Political Repercussions
Khalil’s detention has sparked a broader debate on civil liberties and the extent of executive power. His wife, who is eight months pregnant, expressed profound concern over his arrest, emphasizing the personal toll it has taken. She pleaded for public support, stating, “Mahmoud has been ripped away from me for no reason at all. I am pleading with the world to continue to speak up against his unjust and horrific detention by the Trump administration.”
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) announced plans to file a federal lawsuit on behalf of Khalil and other students against Columbia University and the U.S. government, alleging violations of constitutional rights.
In response to the protest, Vice President J.D. Vance indicated a potential increase in deportations of individuals on green cards and student visas if deemed not beneficial for the United States. This statement underscores the administration’s stance on immigration and national security.
Historical Context of Jewish Activism
The involvement of Jewish organizations in social justice movements is deeply rooted in historical experiences of persecution and a commitment to “tikkun olam” (repairing the world). Jewish Voice for Peace’s participation in the protest reflects a tradition of advocating for marginalized communities and opposing policies perceived as unjust. This aligns with past actions where Jewish activists have stood in solidarity with various social justice causes.
Conclusion
The protest at Trump Tower and the arrest of Mahmoud Khalil have ignited discussions on civil liberties, immigration policies, and the role of activism in contemporary America. As legal proceedings continue and public demonstrations persist, these events highlight the tensions between national security measures and the protection of individual rights. The situation remains fluid, with potential implications for future policy decisions and the broader discourse on dissent and democracy.
